There
are plenty opinions about communism and its history nowadays. One part of
the modern society, even youth, has a positive
attitude to socialism, the theory of K. Marx, the Socialist Revolution in
Russia and state model of the former Soviet Union.
Other people reject communism and criticizes dictatorship of the proletariat.
They decide that capitalism system is better than communism.
As for me, the idea of communism aroused because of social inequality. Dissatisfaction
of poor layers by their social and financial conditions
gradually led to form a new social system.
To my mind not any system but communism in Russia it was natural historical
process.
I quite agree with K. Marx and F. Engels that the socialist revolution was
inevitable to change political and economic system in the country by
reforms, and that ': the proletariat is really revolutionary class. Other
classes decline and destroy themselves with the development of industry,
but proletariat is its own product.'
My aim is study of the communism idea and the theory of its founder - Karl
Marx from modern point of view and opinions of young people.
I suppose it will help us to consider the particular period of our history
- the former USSR which created the unique epoch with its
own special class.
*************
|
|
|
|
Issuing of Marx theory, one can do a conclusion - socialist
revolution was inevitable owing many circumstances.
Capitalism in that aspect in which it existed in CIC-CC
wasn't perfect and became absolute soon. By Marx words '': bourgeoisie
didn't only forge weapon that carried death to it; it gave birth to people,
who would direct this weapon against it - contemporary workers, proletarian.'
Capitalistic system with its cruel exploitation of workers, with its crisis
of overproduction and following of this unemployment wasn't
able to exist calmly for a long period of time.
'In the same degree in which itself develop bourgeoisie that
is capital and proletariat develop itself the class of contemporary workers,
which only then can exist, when find, but they find it only until then
work increases capital: In consequence increasing application of machines
and division of work, work of proletariat lost its independent character
and at the same time any attraction for a worker. A worker become a common
adjunct of a machine he is required - only the most common, monotonous
easiest skills. Because costs on one worker come to almost exclusively
to vital means, that is necessary for his maintenance and work equality
costs its production. Because the same measure in which unattractive ness
of work grows, wages diminish (,,The Manifesto of the Communist Party
K. Marx,F. Engels )
At the same time necessary to mark, that one of a cause
turning proletariat into really revolution class is its higher
organization in comparison, for example with peasantry. In order to work
in factory, where using of work of machines together with work of people
is certainly higher level mental development of people. In consequence
this worker is curable of estimate sensibly social
economics, but and political demands.
However as an each class, proletariat not at once ripened
for conduct of active struggle, only after this situation had become extremely
heavy. In consequence this revolution explosion wasn't inevitable but
the only country in the world, where Socialist revolution conquered was
Russia.
Minsk, Belarus
|